<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QotD: Website Annoyances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/</link>
	<description>Reinvented Software Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin LaCoste</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin LaCoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Hello.

Just browsing around your blog and came across this post so I thought I&#039;d mention one thing for your consideration. As much as I like and appreciate the work of Michael Heilemann and his contribution of Kubrick to the WordPress project, my new pet peeve is justified text. Why? This is the web! Things are so much easier to read with justification turned off.

Anyway, for a much better argument &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antipixel.com/blog/archives/2004/10/24/unjustified.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see this post&lt;/a&gt; on the much loved Antipixel blog. Jeremy says it best.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p>
<p>Just browsing around your blog and came across this post so I thought I&#8217;d mention one thing for your consideration. As much as I like and appreciate the work of Michael Heilemann and his contribution of Kubrick to the WordPress project, my new pet peeve is justified text. Why? This is the web! Things are so much easier to read with justification turned off.</p>
<p>Anyway, for a much better argument <a href="http://www.antipixel.com/blog/archives/2004/10/24/unjustified.html" rel="nofollow">see this post</a> on the much loved Antipixel blog. Jeremy says it best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Harris</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I agree with Claire&#039;s point on the uselessness of the BBC News search engine. It just doesn&#039;t seem to cut it. 

For wannabe web designers I recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0789723107/qid=1111879239/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-5731214-3988455&quot;&gt;Don&#039;t Make Me Think by Steve Krug&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s an entertaining and informative book on the navigation, layout and presentation of a web site from a usability perspective. Most of it is common sense, but that frequently seems to be in short supply even on some big, well-known sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Claire&#8217;s point on the uselessness of the BBC News search engine. It just doesn&#8217;t seem to cut it. </p>
<p>For wannabe web designers I recommend <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0789723107/qid=1111879239/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-5731214-3988455">Don&#8217;t Make Me Think by Steve Krug</a>. It&#8217;s an entertaining and informative book on the navigation, layout and presentation of a web site from a usability perspective. Most of it is common sense, but that frequently seems to be in short supply even on some big, well-known sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ade</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>1. dead links
2. huge images
3. &#039;no way back&#039; syndrome
4. inconsistent layout
5. crammed home page

....Wow! - I&#039;ve just described my old web site perfectly! ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. dead links<br />
2. huge images<br />
3. &#8216;no way back&#8217; syndrome<br />
4. inconsistent layout<br />
5. crammed home page</p>
<p>&#8230;.Wow! &#8211; I&#8217;ve just described my old web site perfectly! &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/03/26/qotd-website-annoyances/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>While in work, my number 1 pet hate is pages that have loads of pointless twiddly things that take forever to download - usually the thing you want to see is downloaded last by which point I&#039;ve given up and gone elsewhere.  And pop ups.

On the Mac, using broadband, obviously the above doesn&#039;t apply.  So I guess it&#039;s sites that aren&#039;t easily navigated - you can&#039;t find what you&#039;re looking for, if there is a navigation menu it doesn&#039;t have the thing you want, and the search function brings up 56 matches that have no relevance (the BBC news website is surprisingly guilty of the latter).

Oh - and websites with bad design.  Too many graphics, annoying colours, too busy - gah!

And one last pet hate - sites that aren&#039;t compatible with Macs.  Well, they&#039;ve lost a large percentage of potential customers already then, haven&#039;t they?  Fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While in work, my number 1 pet hate is pages that have loads of pointless twiddly things that take forever to download &#8211; usually the thing you want to see is downloaded last by which point I&#8217;ve given up and gone elsewhere.  And pop ups.</p>
<p>On the Mac, using broadband, obviously the above doesn&#8217;t apply.  So I guess it&#8217;s sites that aren&#8217;t easily navigated &#8211; you can&#8217;t find what you&#8217;re looking for, if there is a navigation menu it doesn&#8217;t have the thing you want, and the search function brings up 56 matches that have no relevance (the BBC news website is surprisingly guilty of the latter).</p>
<p>Oh &#8211; and websites with bad design.  Too many graphics, annoying colours, too busy &#8211; gah!</p>
<p>And one last pet hate &#8211; sites that aren&#8217;t compatible with Macs.  Well, they&#8217;ve lost a large percentage of potential customers already then, haven&#8217;t they?  Fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

