<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omni Software Update Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/12/05/omni-software-update-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/12/05/omni-software-update-stats/</link>
	<description>Reinvented Software Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Harris</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/12/05/omni-software-update-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/?p=162#comment-894</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting. I was thinking this data could have something like 10% error, just because these stats would be from Omni&#039;s latest-ish generation of apps not all of them, and if someone doesn&#039;t keep their apps up to date then they probably don&#039;t have their OS up to date either and so Omni won&#039;t have the data.

However, at WWDC last June, Steve Jobs put it at something like 50% for Tiger (I don&#039;t remember what the rest was made up of, but it was mostly Panther) - and said that by the end of the year they expected most people to be on Tiger - something like 80 - 90%. I could be wrong, check out the webcast for that, but Omni&#039;s stuff seems to agree. 

This does tend to show that Mac users are good at staying up to date, which I think differentiates them from Windows users to a large degree, with everyone from ordinary users to corporations sticking with a &quot;safe&quot; version, the one that came installed or has been out for at least a couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting. I was thinking this data could have something like 10% error, just because these stats would be from Omni&#8217;s latest-ish generation of apps not all of them, and if someone doesn&#8217;t keep their apps up to date then they probably don&#8217;t have their OS up to date either and so Omni won&#8217;t have the data.</p>
<p>However, at WWDC last June, Steve Jobs put it at something like 50% for Tiger (I don&#8217;t remember what the rest was made up of, but it was mostly Panther) &#8211; and said that by the end of the year they expected most people to be on Tiger &#8211; something like 80 &#8211; 90%. I could be wrong, check out the webcast for that, but Omni&#8217;s stuff seems to agree. </p>
<p>This does tend to show that Mac users are good at staying up to date, which I think differentiates them from Windows users to a large degree, with everyone from ordinary users to corporations sticking with a &#8220;safe&#8221; version, the one that came installed or has been out for at least a couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kim</title>
		<link>http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/2005/12/05/omni-software-update-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventedsoftware.com/blog/?p=162#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Very tasty data.
I&#039;m really surprised that it&#039;s only %10. Our numbers at PF show 20%, but I think that&#039;s just because of schools who haven&#039;t caught up with the times yet.
Makes you wonder if spending all that time testing in Panther and being limited to Panther technologies is worth it. Thanks Steve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very tasty data.<br />
I&#8217;m really surprised that it&#8217;s only %10. Our numbers at PF show 20%, but I think that&#8217;s just because of schools who haven&#8217;t caught up with the times yet.<br />
Makes you wonder if spending all that time testing in Panther and being limited to Panther technologies is worth it. Thanks Steve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

